<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cable news discusses the stimulus package from an angle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ivi.tv/2009/01/cable-news-discusses-the-stimulus-package-from-an-angle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ivi.tv/2009/01/cable-news-discusses-the-stimulus-package-from-an-angle/</link>
	<description>Live Internet Television Done Right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Starr Horne</title>
		<link>http://blog.ivi.tv/2009/01/cable-news-discusses-the-stimulus-package-from-an-angle/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Starr Horne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ivi.tv/?p=266#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I *knew* something like that was going on. Leave it to the guys at ThinkProgress to prove it. 

One of the criticisms that&#039;s been leveled against the internet by many of the mainstream media voices is that it fragments users into such homogenous little groups that it makes impartial reporting impossible.

But I think that&#039;s an unfair criticism. Not only because this sort of preaching-to-the-choir tactic is more than a little rampant in the old media. But also because the internet at least gives those who do care about impartiality the ability to seek it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I *knew* something like that was going on. Leave it to the guys at ThinkProgress to prove it. </p>
<p>One of the criticisms that&#8217;s been leveled against the internet by many of the mainstream media voices is that it fragments users into such homogenous little groups that it makes impartial reporting impossible.</p>
<p>But I think that&#8217;s an unfair criticism. Not only because this sort of preaching-to-the-choir tactic is more than a little rampant in the old media. But also because the internet at least gives those who do care about impartiality the ability to seek it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
